We will remember COVID-19 for loss of life and global lockdowns, but a recent UNESCO report shows it also took a toll on our world heritage properties, with Africa faring the worst. Research from Technische Universität Dresden’s Clemens Schleupner, UNESCO Chair in International Relations and Felix Schmermer, shows us more.
The COVID-19 pandemic will long be remembered for the lockdowns it imposed and the millions of lives it stole, particularly among the elderly. A recent UNESCO report shows that it has also took a subtle yet large toll on our World Heritage properties.
According to new research, World Heritage Sites in certain regions have suffered significant economic impacts of the pandemic, with those in Africa bearing the biggest brunt. In 2021, 52 percent of African World Heritage properties reported COVID-19-related threats, including looting and insufficient materials to conserve sites. In comparison, 34 percent of properties in Asia and the Pacific reported similar issues, while only 15 percent of European and North American sites.
The abrupt cut-off of tourism revenue is first to blame for these impacts. Several African countries are highly dependent on the sector, with tourism accounting for 10 to 20 percent of GDP in Botswana, Gambia and Namibia and over 20 percent in Cabo Verde and the Seychelles.
In 2020, international tourist arrivals dropped by 97 percent compared to 2019, and by 2021 were still 73 percent less than pre-pandemic levels. At its worst point in the pandemic, Africa’s travel and tourism sector lost USD$85.9 billion and 5.8 million jobs.
After global travel came to a halt, sites had to grapple with a sudden decrease in cash and many temporary staff they could no longer keep on. Public subsidies, which cover the bulk of expenditures incurred by the management, staffing, conservation and maintenance of the sites, took a plunge in 44 percent of subsidized African World Heritage Sites. Only 8 percent saw their subsidies increase.
Adding to the pain was the increased looting of World Heritage Sites during lockdowns. In Africa, one of the oldest cities of the continent, Djenné-Djenno, Mali, which is known to have been inhabited from 250 BC, has been heavily affected by illegal excavations and the looting of statues and other artifacts.
The logic is simple: The loss of income during the pandemic exacerbated the situation of those already living in poverty. Although this did not directly affect cultural property, many lost their incomes and some resorted to subsistence looting to survive. In such instances, the pandemic was the epicenter of a compounding impact on cultural heritage.
Existing political and international legal instruments must be strengthened … We must guarantee steadier public funding for sites, rather than relying on emergency responses.
The risk of looting and illegal trade of cultural objects was found to have increased significantly during the pandemic. In March and April 2020, “online illicit trade in looted objects spiked”, according to the Antiquities Trafficking and Heritage Anthropology Research Project.
Insufficiently protected archaeological sites became an easy target for looting or other forms of illegal access. The Antiquities Trafficking and Heritage Anthropology Research Project (ALTHAR), which monitors Facebook groups that serve as marketplaces for cultural antiquities—many often looted—found that many gained hundreds of thousands of new members during the pandemic, raising concerns.
Beyond objects that could be looted, the COVID-19 pandemic also posed a threat to the World Heritage Sites themselves. For example, lockdowns brought a halt to 400-year-old social and cultural rituals for the maintenance of the Konso Cultural Landscape, which is made up of stone-walled terraces and fortified settlements in South Ethiopia’s Konso Highlands.
Retaining the soil from erosion and collecting water that is vital for agriculture, the terraced fields represent not only a central cultural tradition, but an infrastructural necessity. Prior to the pandemic, tourism was the largest income stream and even then, provided only the bare necessity of support.
The precipitous drop in tourism thus worsened the population’s already precarious financial situation. Because the price of building materials also climbed during the pandemic, locals began to use stones from the terraces for construction. The dire situation was aggravated by the absence of on-site security, allowing some looting to occur.
The (mis)use of terrace stones for house construction in the Konso Highlands demonstrates the real threat to the preservation of cultural heritage sites posed by crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. It is worth recalling the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, in which all signatories recognized “that the task of ensuring the identification, protection and conservation of the cultural and natural heritage rests primarily with the state” (Art. 4).
The severe impacts of the pandemic on tangible and intangible cultural heritage have highlighted the fragility of world heritage, especially in the Global South. To build the resilience required to manage future health crises, conflicts, and natural disasters brought on by climate change, a more sustainable approach is needed.
First, existing political and international legal instruments must be strengthened. At present, governments rely on a range of legislative measures to protect their World Heritage Sites. In 2017, the UN Security Council unequivocally condemned the looting and smuggling of cultural good during armed conflict from Iraq and Syria. Nearly a half century earlier, UNESCO’s 1970 convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property prohibits the “illicit import, export and transfer of ownership of cultural property”.
Currently, 32 countries in the African region are parties to the 1970 convention, which is binding on all parties and requires that they abide by the legal standards set forth. However, its effectiveness depends heavily on local implementation and enforcement. Implementation through national laws and enforcement structures varies greatly from country to country. Nevertheless, there have been efforts in the African region to strengthen and harmonize cultural policies, and thus also to better protect African cultural properties.
Despite being under a legal obligation to ensure the protection and preservation of their nation’s cultural heritage, in times of crises, states didn’t seem to be fully able to fulfil their duties. To fill the gap, international support programs and private initiatives have stepped in to support World Heritage Sites. The initiative #SOSAfricanHeritage by the German Commission to UNESCO (DUK) has supported 34 projects in 22 African countries in 2020/2021 with up to EUR25,000 with the specific goal. Still, we must guarantee steadier public funding for sites, rather than relying on emergency responses.
As detailed, the COVID-19 pandemic had numerous negative impacts on cultural heritage. While primarily a health crisis, the pandemic hit cultural heritage hard, inflicting significant damage. during the pandemic period can be traced to the pandemic at its core and its social and economic consequences. Be it the neglect of World Heritage Sites, the decline and absence of tourism, or looting in its various forms.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
***
Adventure.com strives to be a low-emissions publication, and we are working to reduce our carbon emissions where possible. Emissions generated by the movements of our staff and contributors are carbon offset through our parent company, Intrepid. You can visit our sustainability page and read our Contributor Impact Guidelines for more information. While we take our commitment to people and planet seriously, we acknowledge that we still have plenty of work to do, and we welcome all feedback and suggestions from our readers. You can contact us anytime at hello@adventure.com. Please allow up to one week for a response.
The Conversation is an independent source of news and views, sourced from the academic and research community and delivered direct to the public. Our team of professional editors work with university and research institute experts to unlock their knowledge for use by the wider public.
